GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Hamed vs Shields

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
HamedWinner
83.8

Hamed wins: Peak, Statistics

Shields
83.6

Shields wins: Longevity, Honours

Candidates
Locked to Boxing

Shareable URL · /compare/naseem-hamed-vs-claressa-shields

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Naseem Hamed
83.8

Hamed leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Featherweight champion with fifteen title defences and spectacular knockout power.

1. Naseem Hamed
83.8
2. Claressa Shields
83.6

Category breakdown

Season form · Form index per season

Career timeline · Form index per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Form index per season
1. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Naseem Hamed5 years played · career day 1,826312 title wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Claressa Shields5 years played · career day 3,28712 title wins
-96.2% vs Hamed at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Hamed004599232641
🇺🇸 Shields0000012

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricHamedRetiredShieldsActive
Title defences15
Professional wins36
Knockouts31
Professional losses1
World title reign in years6
Olympic golds2
Undisputed titles3
World titles12
Career wins16
Career defeats0
Weight classes4
Dominance w25%8484
Peak w20%9490
Longevity w20%7074
Honours w20%8486
Statistics w15%8884

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Hamed83.8
Shields83.6
The people
Hamed
Shields

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Hamed vs Shields. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →