GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Holman vs Hardaway

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
HolmanWinner
83.9

Holman wins: Dominance, Longevity

Hardaway
83.9

Hardaway wins: Peak, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Basketball

Shareable URL · /compare/nat-holman-vs-tim-hardaway

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Nat Holman
83.9

Holman leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Playmaking star of the Original Celtics, the dominant professional side of the 1920s.

1. Nat Holman
83.9
2. Tim Hardaway
83.9

Category breakdown

Season form · Points per game

Career timeline · Points per game

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Points per game
1. 🇺🇸 Nat Holman5 seasons played · career day 1,826368 points per game
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Tim Hardaway5 seasons played · career day 1,825342 points per game
-7.1% vs Holman at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇺🇸 Holman0060128282740
🇺🇸 Hardaway0050109342685

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricHolmanRetiredHardawayRetired
Professional championships3
Seasons with the Original Celtics8
Hall of Fame induction1,964
Career professional games700
Years at the top level17
All-Star selections5
Career assists7,095
Career points15,373
All-NBA selections5
Olympic gold medals1
Dominance w25%8680
Peak w20%9092
Longevity w20%8280
Honours w20%8080
Statistics w15%8090

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Holman83.9
Hardaway83.9
The people
Holman
Hardaway

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Holman vs Hardaway. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →