GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Sciver-Brunt vs Vaughan

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
Sciver-BruntWinner
85.4

Sciver-Brunt wins: Dominance, Honours

Vaughan
85.4

Vaughan wins: Peak, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/nat-sciver-brunt-vs-michael-vaughan

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇬🇧 Nat Sciver-Brunt
85.4

Sciver-Brunt leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. World Cup winner in 2017 and twice ICC women's cricketer of the year.

1. Nat Sciver-Brunt
85.4
2. Michael Vaughan
85.4

Category breakdown

Season form · Centuries per year

Career timeline · Centuries per year

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Centuries per year
1. 🇬🇧 Nat Sciver-Brunt5 years played · career day 1,825316 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇬🇧 Michael Vaughan5 years played · career day 4,016260 runs
-17.7% vs Sciver-Brunt at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇬🇧 Sciver-Brunt004092316652
🇬🇧 Vaughan00000128

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricSciver-BruntActiveVaughanRetired
World Cup titles1
ICC Cricketer of the Year awards2
ODI centuries9
ODI runs4,000
International wickets150
Ashes series won as captain1
Test wins as captain26
Test runs5,719
Test centuries18
Test runs in 20021,481
Dominance w25%8480
Peak w20%9094
Longevity w20%8282
Honours w20%8482
Statistics w15%8892

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Sciver-Brunt85.4
Vaughan85.4
The people
Sciver-Brunt
Vaughan

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Sciver-Brunt vs Vaughan. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →