Who is better, Cook or Wallace?
Natalie Cook leads with a GOAT score of 83.9 against 83.9 for Wallace de Souza — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Cook vs Wallace
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Natalie Cook and Wallace de Souza level at 83.9. Natalie Cook leads on Longevity. Wallace de Souza leads on Dominance, Statistics, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
CookWinner
83.9Cook wins: Longevity
Wallace
83.9Wallace wins: Dominance, Honours, Statistics
Candidates
Locked to VolleyballShareable URL · /compare/natalie-cook-vs-wallace-de-souza
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇦🇺 Natalie Cook
83.9
Cook leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Natalie Cook
2. Wallace de Souza
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇦🇺 Natalie Cook5 seasons played · career day 1,825346 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇧🇷 Wallace de Souza5 seasons played · career day 1,8259 titles
-97.4% vs Cook at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇺 Cook | 0 | 0 | 52 | 114 | 346 | 704 |
| 🇧🇷 Wallace | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 18 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Cook83.9
Wallace83.9
FAQ
Where does Wallace beat Cook?
Wallace scores higher on dominance, honours, statistics. Cook leads on longevity.
How is the Cook vs Wallace score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Cook: 83.9, Wallace: 83.9.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Cook vs Wallace. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.