GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Sciver-Brunt vs Kallis

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
Sciver-BruntWinner
90.0

Sciver-Brunt wins: Peak, Honours

Kallis
89.6

Kallis wins: Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/natalie-sciver-brunt-vs-jacques-kallis

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇬🇧 Natalie Sciver-Brunt
90.0

Sciver-Brunt leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. World Cup winner in 2017 and a two-time ICC Women's Cricketer of the Year.

1. Natalie Sciver-Brunt
90.0
2. Jacques Kallis
89.6

Category breakdown

Season form · Centuries per year

Career timeline · Centuries per year

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Centuries per year
1. 🇿🇦 Jacques Kallis5 years played · career day 2,191247 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇬🇧 Natalie Sciver-Brunt5 years played · career day 1,825204 runs
-17.4% vs Kallis at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇬🇧 Sciver-Brunt002862204454
🇿🇦 Kallis00040196427

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricSciver-BruntActiveKallisRetired
World Cup titles1
ICC Cricketer of the Year awards2
ODI runs4,00011,579
ODI wickets80
ODI centuries9
Test runs13,289
Test wickets292
Test centuries45
Test average55.37
ICC Player of the Year1
Dominance w25%8888
Peak w20%9688
Longevity w20%8294
Honours w20%9084
Statistics w15%9696

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Sciver-Brunt90.0
Kallis89.6
The people
Sciver-Brunt
Kallis

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Sciver-Brunt vs Kallis. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →