Who is better, Sciver-Brunt or Ashwin?
Ravichandran Ashwin leads with a GOAT score of 90.5 against 90.0 for Natalie Sciver-Brunt — a gap of 0.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Sciver-Brunt vs Ashwin
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Ravichandran Ashwin above Natalie Sciver-Brunt: 90.5 vs 90.0. Ravichandran Ashwin leads on Longevity, Dominance. Natalie Sciver-Brunt leads on Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
AshwinWinner
90.5Ashwin wins: Dominance, Longevity
Sciver-Brunt
90.0Sciver-Brunt wins: Peak, Honours
Candidates
Locked to CricketShareable URL · /compare/natalie-sciver-brunt-vs-ravichandran-ashwin
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇮🇳 Ravichandran Ashwin
90.5
Ashwin leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Ravichandran Ashwin
2. Natalie Sciver-Brunt
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇬🇧 Natalie Sciver-Brunt5 years played · career day 1,825204 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇮🇳 Ravichandran Ashwin5 years played · career day 2,190196 runs
-3.9% vs Sciver-Brunt at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Sciver-Brunt | 0 | 0 | 28 | 62 | 204 | 454 |
| 🇮🇳 Ashwin | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 134 | 331 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | Sciver-BruntActive | AshwinRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Cup titles | 1 | — |
| ICC Cricketer of the Year awards | 2 | — |
| ODI runs | 4,000 | — |
| ODI wickets | 80 | — |
| ODI centuries | 9 | — |
| Test wickets | — | 537 |
| Five-wicket hauls | — | 37 |
| Test runs | — | 3,503 |
| T20 World Cup titles | — | 1 |
| Player of the Series awards | — | 11 |
| Dominance w25% | 88 | 90 |
| Peak w20% | 96 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 90 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 96 | 96 |
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Ashwin90.5
Sciver-Brunt90.0
FAQ
Where does Sciver-Brunt beat Ashwin?
Sciver-Brunt scores higher on peak, honours. Ashwin leads on dominance, longevity.
How is the Sciver-Brunt vs Ashwin score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Sciver-Brunt: 90.0, Ashwin: 90.5.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Sciver-Brunt vs Ashwin. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.