Who is better, Sciver-Brunt or Waqar?
Natalie Sciver-Brunt leads with a GOAT score of 90.0 against 89.8 for Waqar Younis — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Natalie Sciver-Brunt above Waqar Younis: 90.0 vs 89.8. Natalie Sciver-Brunt leads on Honours, Statistics. Waqar Younis leads on Dominance, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Sciver-Brunt wins: Honours, Statistics
Waqar wins: Dominance, Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/natalie-sciver-brunt-vs-waqar-younis
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Sciver-Brunt leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Sciver-Brunt | 0 | 0 | 28 | 62 | 204 | 454 |
| 🇵🇰 Waqar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 29 | 147 | 264 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | Sciver-BruntActive | WaqarRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Cup titles | 1 | — |
| ICC Cricketer of the Year awards | 2 | — |
| ODI runs | 4,000 | — |
| ODI wickets | 80 | 416 |
| ODI centuries | 9 | — |
| Test wickets | — | 373 |
| Test strike rate | — | 43.4 |
| Five-wicket hauls | — | 22 |
| Test matches | — | 87 |
| Dominance w25% | 88 | 90 |
| Peak w20% | 96 | 96 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 90 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 96 | 94 |
Natalie Sciver-Brunt leads with a GOAT score of 90.0 against 89.8 for Waqar Younis — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Waqar scores higher on dominance, longevity. Sciver-Brunt leads on honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Sciver-Brunt: 90.0, Waqar: 89.8.
Make your case for Sciver-Brunt vs Waqar. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.