GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Sciver-Brunt vs Waqar

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
Sciver-BruntWinner
90.0

Sciver-Brunt wins: Honours, Statistics

Waqar
89.8

Waqar wins: Dominance, Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/natalie-sciver-brunt-vs-waqar-younis

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇬🇧 Natalie Sciver-Brunt
90.0

Sciver-Brunt leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. World Cup winner in 2017 and a two-time ICC Women's Cricketer of the Year.

1. Natalie Sciver-Brunt
90.0
2. Waqar Younis
89.8

Category breakdown

Season form · Centuries per year

Career timeline · Centuries per year

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Centuries per year
1. 🇬🇧 Natalie Sciver-Brunt5 years played · career day 1,825204 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇵🇰 Waqar Younis5 years played · career day 2,190174 runs
-14.7% vs Sciver-Brunt at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇬🇧 Sciver-Brunt002862204454
🇵🇰 Waqar00029147264

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricSciver-BruntActiveWaqarRetired
World Cup titles1
ICC Cricketer of the Year awards2
ODI runs4,000
ODI wickets80416
ODI centuries9
Test wickets373
Test strike rate43.4
Five-wicket hauls22
Test matches87
Dominance w25%8890
Peak w20%9696
Longevity w20%8284
Honours w20%9086
Statistics w15%9694

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Sciver-Brunt90.0
Waqar89.8
The people
Sciver-Brunt
Waqar

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Sciver-Brunt vs Waqar. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →