Who is better, Sciver-Brunt or Younis?
Natalie Sciver-Brunt leads with a GOAT score of 90.0 against 90.0 for Younis Khan — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Natalie Sciver-Brunt and Younis Khan level at 90.0. Natalie Sciver-Brunt leads on Peak, Dominance, Honours. Younis Khan leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Sciver-Brunt wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Younis wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/natalie-sciver-brunt-vs-younis-khan
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Sciver-Brunt leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Sciver-Brunt | 0 | 0 | 28 | 62 | 204 | 454 |
| 🇵🇰 Younis | 0 | 0 | 30 | 70 | 163 | 438 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | Sciver-BruntActive | YounisRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Cup titles | 1 | — |
| ICC Cricketer of the Year awards | 2 | — |
| ODI runs | 4,000 | — |
| ODI wickets | 80 | — |
| ODI centuries | 9 | — |
| Test runs | — | 10,099 |
| Test centuries | — | 34 |
| Test batting average | — | 52 |
| World T20 titles | — | 1 |
| Test matches | — | 118 |
| Dominance w25% | 88 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 96 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 92 |
| Honours w20% | 90 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 96 | 94 |
Natalie Sciver-Brunt leads with a GOAT score of 90.0 against 90.0 for Younis Khan — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Younis scores higher on longevity. Sciver-Brunt leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Sciver-Brunt: 90.0, Younis: 90.0.
Make your case for Sciver-Brunt vs Younis. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.