GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Jonas vs McGuigan

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
McGuiganWinner
80.5

McGuigan wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics

Jonas
80.4

Jonas wins: Longevity, Honours

Candidates
Locked to Boxing

Shareable URL · /compare/natasha-jonas-vs-barry-mcguigan

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇮🇪 Barry McGuigan
80.5

McGuigan leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. WBA featherweight champion whose 1985 win over Eusebio Pedroza united Ireland.

1. Barry McGuigan
80.5
2. Natasha Jonas
80.4

Category breakdown

Season form · Form index per season

Career timeline · Form index per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Form index per season
1. 🇮🇪 Barry McGuigan5 years played · career day 1,82530 title wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇬🇧 Natasha Jonas5 years played · career day 1,82513 title wins
-56.7% vs McGuigan at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇬🇧 Jonas00361317
🇮🇪 McGuigan008153035

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricJonasActiveMcGuiganRetired
World titles won4
Olympic appearances1
Professional wins1532
Knockout wins9
Weight classes with world titles2
World titles1
Career knockouts28
Professional bouts35
European titles1
Dominance w25%7680
Peak w20%9092
Longevity w20%7268
Honours w20%8278
Statistics w15%8486

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
McGuigan80.5
Jonas80.4
The people
Jonas
McGuigan

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Jonas vs McGuigan. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →