GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Fraser vs Dimitrov

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
FraserWinner
79.2

Fraser wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours

Dimitrov
79.1

Dimitrov wins: Longevity, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/neale-fraser-vs-grigor-dimitrov

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇦🇺 Neale Fraser
79.2

Fraser leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Three-time major singles champion and a great doubles player.

1. Neale Fraser
79.2
2. Grigor Dimitrov
79.1

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇦🇺 Neale Fraser5 seasons played · career day 1,825334 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇧🇬 Grigor Dimitrov5 seasons played · career day 2,92111 titles
-96.7% vs Fraser at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇦🇺 Fraser0048105334640
🇧🇬 Dimitrov0000114

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricFraserRetiredDimitrovActive
Major singles titles3
US Championships titles2
Wimbledon titles1
Major doubles titles11
Davis Cup titles4
ATP Finals titles1
ATP titles9
Masters 1000 titles1
Career-high ranking3
Career match wins450
Dominance w25%7872
Peak w20%9086
Longevity w20%6886
Honours w20%8272
Statistics w15%7882

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Fraser79.2
Dimitrov79.1
The people
Fraser
Dimitrov

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Fraser vs Dimitrov. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →