Who is better, Piquet Jr or Depailler?
Patrick Depailler leads with a GOAT score of 71.0 against 70.8 for Nelson Piquet Jr — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Patrick Depailler above Nelson Piquet Jr: 71.0 vs 70.8. Patrick Depailler leads on Dominance, Longevity. Nelson Piquet Jr leads on Honours, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Depailler wins: Dominance, Longevity
Piquet Jr wins: Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/nelson-piquet-jr-vs-patrick-depailler
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Depailler leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇧🇷 Piquet Jr | 0 | 0 | 19 | 19 | 19 | 19 |
| 🇫🇷 Depailler | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 22 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | Piquet JrRetired | DepaillerRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Formula E titles | 1 | — |
| Grands Prix entered | 28 | — |
| Formula 1 podiums | 1 | — |
| Career F1 points | 19 | — |
| GP2 runner-up finishes | 1 | — |
| Grand Prix wins | — | 2 |
| Podiums | — | 19 |
| Pole positions | — | 1 |
| Grand Prix starts | — | 95 |
| Best championship finish | — | 4 |
| Dominance w25% | 62 | 66 |
| Peak w20% | 84 | 82 |
| Longevity w20% | 66 | 70 |
| Honours w20% | 68 | 62 |
| Statistics w15% | 78 | 78 |
Patrick Depailler leads with a GOAT score of 71.0 against 70.8 for Nelson Piquet Jr — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Piquet Jr scores higher on peak, honours. Depailler leads on dominance, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Piquet Jr: 70.8, Depailler: 71.0.
Make your case for Piquet Jr vs Depailler. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.