AthletesTeams
NEO vs ppd
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
ppdWinner
87.9ppd wins: Honours, Statistics
NEO
87.7NEO wins: Longevity
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Peter "ppd" Dager
87.9
ppd leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. Captained Evil Geniuses to victory at The International 2015.
1. Peter "ppd" Dager
2. NEO
Category breakdown
Season form · Trophies per season
Career timeline · Trophies per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through split year 5 · Trophies per season1. 🇵🇱 NEO5 split years played · career day 1,826414 trophies
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Peter "ppd" Dager5 split years played · career day 1,825399 trophies
-3.6% vs NEO at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇵🇱 NEO | 0 | 0 | 62 | 138 | 322 | 724 |
| 🇺🇸 ppd | 0 | 0 | 55 | 132 | 399 | 633 |
Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 split years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.
| Metric | NEORetired | ppdRetired |
|---|---|---|
| HLTV number one ranking | 1 | — |
| Majors won | 1 | — |
| World Championship titles | 3 | — |
| Years at tier-one level | 17 | — |
| Big event titles | 25 | — |
| The International titles | — | 1 |
| Major titles | — | 2 |
| The International top-three finishes | — | 2 |
| Seasons played | — | 9 |
| Career prize money in millions | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 90 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 92 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 88 |
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
ppd87.9
NEO87.7
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for NEO vs ppd. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.