Who is better, Buoniconti or Luckman?
Nick Buoniconti leads with a GOAT score of 88.5 against 88.4 for Sid Luckman — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Nick Buoniconti above Sid Luckman: 88.5 vs 88.4. Nick Buoniconti leads on Longevity, Statistics. Sid Luckman leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Buoniconti wins: Longevity, Statistics
Luckman wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/nick-buoniconti-vs-sid-luckman
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Buoniconti leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Buoniconti | 0 | 0 | 50 | 107 | 316 | 672 |
| 🇺🇸 Luckman | 0 | 0 | 50 | 112 | 370 | 672 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BuonicontiRetired | LuckmanRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Super Bowl titles | 2 | — |
| All-star selections | 8 | — |
| Career interceptions | 32 | — |
| Perfect seasons | 1 | — |
| Seasons played | 15 | — |
| NFL titles | — | 4 |
| NFL MVP awards | — | 1 |
| Touchdown passes in one game | — | 7 |
| Passing touchdowns | — | 137 |
| All-Pro selections | — | 5 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 88 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 96 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 90 | 92 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 88 |
Nick Buoniconti leads with a GOAT score of 88.5 against 88.4 for Sid Luckman — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Luckman scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Buoniconti leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Buoniconti: 88.5, Luckman: 88.4.
Make your case for Buoniconti vs Luckman. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.