GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Pietrangeli vs Roddick

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
RoddickWinner
85.6

Roddick wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours

Pietrangeli
85.5

Pietrangeli wins: Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/nicola-pietrangeli-vs-andy-roddick

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Andy Roddick
85.6

Roddick leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. US Open champion in 2003, world No. 1 and a four-time Wimbledon finalist.

1. Andy Roddick
85.6
2. Nicola Pietrangeli
85.5

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇺🇸 Andy Roddick5 seasons played · career day 2,19121 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇮🇹 Nicola Pietrangeli5 seasons played · career day 2,55520 titles
-4.8% vs Roddick at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇮🇹 Pietrangeli0000929
🇺🇸 Roddick00021328

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricPietrangeliRetiredRoddickRetired
Grand Slam singles titles21
Grand Slam doubles titles1
Davis Cup matches164
Davis Cup wins120
Career titles48
ATP titles32
Weeks at No. 113
Davis Cup titles1
Grand Slam finals5
Dominance w25%8082
Peak w20%9094
Longevity w20%8880
Honours w20%8284
Statistics w15%9090

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Roddick85.6
Pietrangeli85.5
The people
Pietrangeli
Roddick

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Pietrangeli vs Roddick. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →