GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Dar vs Chandrasekhar

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
ChandrasekharWinner
84.7

Chandrasekhar wins: Dominance, Peak

Dar
84.6

Dar wins: Longevity, Honours

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/nida-dar-vs-b-s-chandrasekhar

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇮🇳 B. S. Chandrasekhar
84.7

Chandrasekhar leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Match-winning leg spinner behind India's landmark wins in England and Australia.

1. B. S. Chandrasekhar
84.7
2. Nida Dar
84.6

Category breakdown

Season form · Centuries per year

Career timeline · Centuries per year

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Centuries per year
1. 🇵🇰 Nida Dar5 years played · career day 1,82598 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇮🇳 B. S. Chandrasekhar5 years played · career day 2,19186 runs
-12.2% vs Dar at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇵🇰 Dar00102698234
🇮🇳 Chandrasekhar0001866145

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricDarActiveChandrasekharRetired
T20I wickets141
ODI wickets80
T20I runs2,000
Asian Games golds1
International seasons15
Test wickets242
Tests played58
Five-wicket hauls16
Ten-wicket matches2
Test bowling average29.74
Dominance w25%8082
Peak w20%9094
Longevity w20%8682
Honours w20%7876
Statistics w15%9292

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Chandrasekhar84.7
Dar84.6
The people
Dar
Chandrasekhar

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Dar vs Chandrasekhar. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →