Who is better, Dar or Ecclestone?
Nida Dar leads with a GOAT score of 84.6 against 84.6 for Sophie Ecclestone — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Nida Dar and Sophie Ecclestone level at 84.6. Nida Dar leads on Longevity, Statistics. Sophie Ecclestone leads on Dominance, Honours, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Dar wins: Longevity, Statistics
Ecclestone wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/nida-dar-vs-sophie-ecclestone
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Dar leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇵🇰 Dar | 0 | 0 | 10 | 26 | 98 | 234 |
| 🇬🇧 Ecclestone | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 80 | 247 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | DarActive | EcclestoneActive |
|---|---|---|
| T20I wickets | 141 | — |
| ODI wickets | 80 | 100 |
| T20I runs | 2,000 | — |
| Asian Games golds | 1 | — |
| International seasons | 15 | — |
| T20 World Cup titles | — | 1 |
| T20 international wickets | — | 130 |
| Commonwealth medals | — | 1 |
| Months as No. 1 bowler | — | 50 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 72 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 90 |
Nida Dar leads with a GOAT score of 84.6 against 84.6 for Sophie Ecclestone — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Ecclestone scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Dar leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Dar: 84.6, Ecclestone: 84.6.
Make your case for Dar vs Ecclestone. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.