GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Benn vs McCaskill

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
BennWinner
82.5

Benn wins: Dominance, Statistics

McCaskill
82.5

McCaskill wins: Longevity, Honours

Candidates
Locked to Boxing

Shareable URL · /compare/nigel-benn-vs-jessica-mccaskill

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Nigel Benn
82.5

Benn leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. The Dark Destroyer won WBO middleweight and WBC super middleweight world titles.

1. Nigel Benn
82.5
2. Jessica McCaskill
82.5

Category breakdown

Season form · Form index per season

Career timeline · Form index per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Form index per season
1. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Nigel Benn5 years played · career day 1,825311 title wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Jessica McCaskill5 years played · career day 1,82515 title wins
-95.2% vs Benn at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Benn004599311621
🇺🇸 McCaskill00371522

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricBennRetiredMcCaskillActive
World titles in weight classes2
Professional wins4212
Knockouts35
Title defences9
Professional bouts48
Undisputed titles1
World titles won5
Knockout wins5
World title fights10
Dominance w25%8280
Peak w20%9292
Longevity w20%7072
Honours w20%8284
Statistics w15%8886

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Benn82.5
McCaskill82.5
The people
Benn
McCaskill

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Benn vs McCaskill. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →