Who is better, Fischer or Mijatović?
Nilla Fischer leads with a GOAT score of 82.8 against 82.8 for Predrag Mijatović — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Nilla Fischer and Predrag Mijatović level at 82.8. Nilla Fischer leads on Longevity, Honours. Predrag Mijatović leads on Peak, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Fischer wins: Longevity, Honours
Mijatović wins: Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/nilla-fischer-vs-predrag-mijatovic
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Fischer leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇸🇪 Fischer | 0 | 0 | 8 | 22 | 82 | 165 |
| 🇲🇪 Mijatović | 0 | 0 | 50 | 105 | 300 | 634 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | FischerRetired | MijatovićRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden caps | 194 | — |
| Olympic silver medals | 2 | — |
| Bundesliga titles | 4 | — |
| Champions League finals | 3 | — |
| Swedish Footballer of the Year awards | 3 | — |
| Champions League titles | — | 1 |
| La Liga titles | — | 1 |
| Intercontinental Cup titles | — | 1 |
| Career goals | — | 214 |
| Yugoslavia caps | — | 73 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 84 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 90 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 78 | 86 |
Nilla Fischer leads with a GOAT score of 82.8 against 82.8 for Predrag Mijatović — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Mijatović scores higher on peak, statistics. Fischer leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Fischer: 82.8, Mijatović: 82.8.
Make your case for Fischer vs Mijatović. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.