GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Liedholm vs Sawa

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
LiedholmWinner
85.9

Liedholm wins: Peak, Honours

Sawa
85.9

Sawa wins: Dominance, Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Football

Shareable URL · /compare/nils-liedholm-vs-homare-sawa

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇸🇪 Nils Liedholm
85.9

Liedholm leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Olympic champion in 1948, Milan legend and a World Cup finalist in 1958.

1. Nils Liedholm
85.9
2. Homare Sawa
85.9

Category breakdown

Season form · Goals per season

Career timeline · Goals per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Goals per season
1. 🇸🇪 Nils Liedholm5 seasons played · career day 1,825308 goals
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇯🇵 Homare Sawa5 seasons played · career day 2,55628 goals
-90.9% vs Liedholm at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇸🇪 Liedholm0050106308658
🇯🇵 Sawa00001836

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricLiedholmRetiredSawaRetired
Olympic gold medals1
Serie A titles4
World Cup finals1
Milan appearances394
Latin Cup titles2
International goals83
International caps205
World Cups1
World Cup Golden Ball1
FIFA World Player awards1
Asian Player of the Year1
Dominance w25%8283
Peak w20%9290
Longevity w20%8488
Honours w20%8885
Statistics w15%8484

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Liedholm85.9
Sawa85.9
The people
Liedholm
Sawa

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Liedholm vs Sawa. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →