GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

George vs Hobbs

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
HobbsWinner
90.6

Hobbs wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics

George
23.0

George wins: no category outright

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/nl-katie-george-vs-jack-hobbs

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Jack Hobbs
90.6

Hobbs leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories. The Master: a record 61,760 first-class runs and 199 centuries.

GeorgeInsufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.

1. Jack Hobbs
90.6
2. Katie George
Pending verification

Category breakdown

Season form · Centuries per year

Career timeline · Centuries per year

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Centuries per year
1. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Jack Hobbs5 years played · career day 2,55529 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🌍 Katie George0 years played0 runs
-100.0% vs Hobbs at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🌍 George000000
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Hobbs00001549

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricGeorgeRetiredHobbsRetired
First-class runs61,760
First-class centuries199
Test runs5,410
Test average56.94
Test centuries15
Dominance w25%22.990
Peak w20%24.992
Longevity w20%20.994
Honours w20%23.984
Statistics w15%21.994

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Hobbs90.6
George23.0
The people
George
Hobbs

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for George vs Hobbs. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →