Who is better, Fields or Alshammar?
Therese Alshammar leads with a GOAT score of 90.3 against 29.4 for Rick Fields — a gap of 60.9 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Fields vs Alshammar
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Therese Alshammar above Rick Fields: 90.3 vs 29.4. Therese Alshammar leads on Longevity, Statistics, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
AlshammarWinner
90.3Alshammar wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Fields
29.4Fields wins: no category outright
Candidates
Locked to SwimmingShareable URL · /compare/nl-rick-fields-vs-therese-alshammar
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇸🇪 Therese Alshammar
90.3
Alshammar leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Fields — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
1. Therese Alshammar
2. Rick Fields
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇸🇪 Therese Alshammar5 seasons played · career day 2,556124.9 major golds
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🌍 Rick Fields0 seasons played0 major golds
-100.0% vs Alshammar at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🌍 Fields | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 🇸🇪 Alshammar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 75.7 | 174.01 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Alshammar90.3
Fields29.4
FAQ
Where does Fields beat Alshammar?
Fields does not lead any of the five categories; Alshammar is ahead or level on all of them.
How is the Fields vs Alshammar score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Fields: 29.4, Alshammar: 90.3.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Fields vs Alshammar. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.