GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Hasegawa vs Bátorfi

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
HasegawaWinner
82.0

Hasegawa wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics

Bátorfi
82.0

Bátorfi wins: Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Table Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/nobuhiko-hasegawa-vs-csilla-batorfi-tt

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇯🇵 Nobuhiko Hasegawa
82.0

Hasegawa leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. World singles champion in Stockholm 1967 during Japan's golden era.

1. Nobuhiko Hasegawa
82.0
2. Csilla Bátorfi
82.0

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇯🇵 Nobuhiko Hasegawa5 seasons played · career day 1,825388 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇭🇺 Csilla Bátorfi5 seasons played · career day 1,826273 titles
-29.6% vs Hasegawa at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇯🇵 Hasegawa0058126388702
🇭🇺 Bátorfi004696210569

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricHasegawaRetiredBátorfiRetired
World Championship singles titles1
World team titles2
World Championship medals52
Asian Championship titles2
Years at the top level11
European Championship titles2
Olympic appearances5
European medals8
National titles12
Dominance w25%8276
Peak w20%9285
Longevity w20%7088
Honours w20%8482
Statistics w15%8280

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Hasegawa82.0
Bátorfi82.0
The people
Hasegawa
Bátorfi

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Hasegawa vs Bátorfi. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →