Who is better, Morceli or Alekna?
Nourredine Morceli leads with a GOAT score of 89.1 against 89.1 for Virgilijus Alekna — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Nourredine Morceli and Virgilijus Alekna level at 89.1. Nourredine Morceli leads on Peak, Dominance, Honours. Virgilijus Alekna leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Morceli wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Alekna wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/noureddine-morceli-vs-virgilijus-alekna
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Morceli leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇩🇿 Morceli | 0 | 0 | 8 | 9 | 12 | 22 |
| 🇱🇹 Alekna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 15 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | MorceliRetired | AleknaRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic gold medals | 1 | 2 |
| World Championship titles | 3 | — |
| World records set | 4 | — |
| 1500 m personal best | 3.27 | — |
| Career years | 11 | — |
| World Championship golds | — | 2 |
| Olympic medals | — | 3 |
| Best throw in metres | — | 73.88 |
| Olympic Games contested | — | 5 |
| Dominance w25% | 90 | 88 |
| Peak w20% | 96 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 90 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 90 |
Nourredine Morceli leads with a GOAT score of 89.1 against 89.1 for Virgilijus Alekna — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Alekna scores higher on longevity. Morceli leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Morceli: 89.1, Alekna: 89.1.
Make your case for Morceli vs Alekna. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.