Who is better, Adeniken or Van Balkom?
Patrick van Balkom leads with a GOAT score of 79.4 against 79.3 for Olapade Adeniken — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Patrick van Balkom above Olapade Adeniken: 79.4 vs 79.3. Patrick van Balkom leads on Longevity, Honours. Olapade Adeniken leads on Peak, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Van Balkom wins: Longevity, Honours
Adeniken wins: Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/olapade-adeniken-vs-patrick-van-balkom
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Van Balkom leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇳🇬 Adeniken | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20.3 | 80.45 | 161.85 |
| 🇳🇱 Van Balkom | 0 | 0 | 50 | 107 | 316 | 642 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AdenikenRetired | Van BalkomRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic medals | 1 | — |
| World Championship medals | 2 | — |
| 200 m personal best | 19.95 | — |
| 100 m personal best | 10.02 | — |
| African Championship medals | 3 | — |
| European Championship medals | — | 1 |
| Dutch titles | — | 8 |
| Olympic appearances | — | 2 |
| Personal best 200 m (s) | — | 20.51 |
| National records | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 72 | 72 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 84 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 76 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 84 |
Patrick van Balkom leads with a GOAT score of 79.4 against 79.3 for Olapade Adeniken — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Adeniken scores higher on peak, statistics. Van Balkom leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Adeniken: 79.3, Van Balkom: 79.4.
Make your case for Adeniken vs Van Balkom. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.