Who is better, Stoyanovskiy or Abramov?
Oleg Stoyanovskiy leads with a GOAT score of 85.8 against 85.6 for Pavel Abramov — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Oleg Stoyanovskiy above Pavel Abramov: 85.8 vs 85.6. Oleg Stoyanovskiy leads on Dominance, Honours. Pavel Abramov leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Stoyanovskiy wins: Dominance, Honours
Abramov wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/oleg-stoyanovskiy-vs-pavel-abramov
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Stoyanovskiy leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇷🇺 Stoyanovskiy | 0 | 0 | 55 | 120 | 375 | 742 |
| 🇷🇺 Abramov | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 47 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | StoyanovskiyActive | AbramovRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship gold medals | 1 | — |
| Olympic medals | 1 | 2 |
| World Tour titles | 6 | — |
| Youth world titles | 2 | — |
| Olympic appearances | 1 | — |
| Olympic golds | — | 1 |
| World League titles | — | 3 |
| European Championship titles | — | 1 |
| Champions League titles | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 88 |
Oleg Stoyanovskiy leads with a GOAT score of 85.8 against 85.6 for Pavel Abramov — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Abramov scores higher on longevity. Stoyanovskiy leads on dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Stoyanovskiy: 85.8, Abramov: 85.6.
Make your case for Stoyanovskiy vs Abramov. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.