Who is better, Matson or Mack?
Ollie Matson leads with a GOAT score of 87.6 against 87.6 for Tom Mack — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Matson vs Mack
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Ollie Matson and Tom Mack level at 87.6. Ollie Matson leads on Peak, Honours. Tom Mack leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
MatsonWinner
87.6Matson wins: Peak, Honours
Mack
87.6Mack wins: Longevity
Candidates
Locked to American FootballShareable URL · /compare/ollie-matson-vs-tom-mack
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Ollie Matson
87.6
Matson leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Ollie Matson
2. Tom Mack
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇺🇸 Ollie Matson5 seasons played · career day 1,826366 touchdowns
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Tom Mack5 seasons played · career day 1,825314 touchdowns
-14.2% vs Matson at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Matson | 0 | 0 | 50 | 112 | 270 | 690 |
| 🇺🇸 Mack | 0 | 0 | 50 | 106 | 314 | 666 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Matson87.6
Mack87.6
FAQ
Where does Mack beat Matson?
Mack scores higher on longevity. Matson leads on peak, honours.
How is the Matson vs Mack score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Matson: 87.6, Mack: 87.6.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Matson vs Mack. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.