AthletesTeams
Oner vs w0nderful
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
OnerWinner
84.3Oner wins: Longevity, Honours
w0nderful
83.7w0nderful wins: Statistics
Candidates
Locked to EsportsShareable URL · /compare/oner-lol-vs-es-wonderful
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇰🇷 Mun "Oner" Hyeon-jun
84.3
Oner leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Mun "Oner" Hyeon-jun
2. Ihor "w0nderful" Zhdanov
Category breakdown
Season form · Trophies per season
Career timeline · Trophies per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through split year 5 · Trophies per season1. 🇰🇷 Mun "Oner" Hyeon-jun5 split years played · career day 1,825440 trophies
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇦 Ihor "w0nderful" Zhdanov5 split years played · career day 1,825418 trophies
-5.0% vs Oner at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇰🇷 Oner | 0 | 0 | 76 | 162 | 440 | 440 |
| 🇺🇦 w0nderful | 0 | 0 | 60 | 138 | 418 | 506 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | OnerActive | w0nderfulActive |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship titles | 2 | — |
| World finals | 4 | — |
| LCK titles | 1 | — |
| Mid-Season Invitational titles | 1 | — |
| Professional seasons | 5 | — |
| Majors won | — | 1 |
| Big tournament titles | — | 6 |
| HLTV top-20 placements | — | 2 |
| Tournament MVP awards | — | 1 |
| Seasons played | — | 5 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 72 | 68 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 90 |
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Oner84.3
w0nderful83.7
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Oner vs w0nderful. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.