Who is better, Charleston or Cobb?
Ty Cobb leads with a GOAT score of 92.8 against 92.7 for Oscar Charleston — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Ty Cobb above Oscar Charleston: 92.8 vs 92.7. Ty Cobb leads on Longevity, Statistics. Oscar Charleston leads on Peak, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Cobb wins: Longevity, Statistics
Charleston wins: Dominance, Peak
Shareable URL · /compare/oscar-charleston-vs-ty-cobb
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Cobb leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Charleston | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.509 |
| 🇺🇸 Cobb | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.051 | 2.653 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | CharlestonRetired | CobbRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Career batting average | 0.364 | 0.366 |
| Negro League batting titles | 4 | — |
| Negro World Series titles | 2 | — |
| Seasons played | 27 | — |
| Hall of Fame inductions | 1 | — |
| Batting titles | — | 11 |
| Career hits | — | 4,189 |
| MVP awards | — | 1 |
| Stolen bases | — | 897 |
| Runs scored | — | 2,246 |
| Dominance w25% | 94 | 93 |
| Peak w20% | 96 | 93 |
| Longevity w20% | 90 | 94 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 96 | 97 |
Ty Cobb leads with a GOAT score of 92.8 against 92.7 for Oscar Charleston — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Charleston scores higher on peak, dominance. Cobb leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Charleston: 92.7, Cobb: 92.8.
Make your case for Charleston vs Cobb. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.