Who is better, Piastri or Firman?
Oscar Piastri leads with a GOAT score of 60.0 against 58.9 for Ralph Firman — a gap of 1.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Oscar Piastri above Ralph Firman: 60.0 vs 58.9. Oscar Piastri leads on Peak, Statistics, Dominance. Ralph Firman leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Piastri wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Firman wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/oscar-piastri-vs-ralph-firman-f1v
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Piastri leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇺 Piastri | 0 | 0 | 97 | 389 | 1,069 | 1,069 |
| 🇮🇪 Firman | 0 | 0 | 38 | 81 | 243 | 509 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | PiastriActive | FirmanRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Prix wins | 9 | — |
| Podiums | 25 | — |
| Pole positions | 6 | — |
| Sprint wins | 2 | — |
| Best championship finish | 2 | — |
| Formula One starts | — | 14 |
| Formula One points | — | 1 |
| Japanese Formula Nippon titles | — | 1 |
| British F3 titles | — | 1 |
| Macau Grand Prix wins | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 62 | 52 |
| Peak w20% | 78 | 64 |
| Longevity w20% | 40 | 68 |
| Honours w20% | 52 | 54 |
| Statistics w15% | 70 | 58 |
Oscar Piastri leads with a GOAT score of 60.0 against 58.9 for Ralph Firman — a gap of 1.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Firman scores higher on honours, longevity. Piastri leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Piastri: 60.0, Firman: 58.9.
Make your case for Piastri vs Firman. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.