Who is better, Graham or Gonzalez?
Otto Graham leads with a GOAT score of 92.0 against 91.6 for Tony Gonzalez — a gap of 0.4 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Otto Graham above Tony Gonzalez: 92.0 vs 91.6. Otto Graham leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak. Tony Gonzalez leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Graham wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Gonzalez wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/otto-graham-vs-tony-gonzalez
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Graham leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Graham | 0 | 0 | 55 | 121 | 385 | 673 |
| 🇺🇸 Gonzalez | 0 | 0 | 368 | 989 | 3,958 | 7,810 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | GrahamRetired | GonzalezRetired |
|---|---|---|
| League titles | 7 | — |
| Championship games reached | 10 | — |
| Most Valuable Player awards | 5 | — |
| Passing yards | 23,584 | — |
| Career winning percentage | 81 | — |
| Career receptions | — | 1,325 |
| Pro Bowls | — | 14 |
| Career receiving yards | — | 15,127 |
| Receiving touchdowns | — | 111 |
| Seasons played | — | 17 |
| Dominance w25% | 94 | 88 |
| Peak w20% | 98 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 94 |
| Honours w20% | 96 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 94 | 96 |
Otto Graham leads with a GOAT score of 92.0 against 91.6 for Tony Gonzalez — a gap of 0.4 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Gonzalez scores higher on statistics, longevity. Graham leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Graham: 92.0, Gonzalez: 91.6.
Make your case for Graham vs Gonzalez. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.