GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Newsome vs Mackey

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
NewsomeWinner
86.3

Newsome wins: Longevity, Statistics

Mackey
86.3

Mackey wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours

Candidates
Locked to American Football

Shareable URL · /compare/ozzie-newsome-vs-john-mackey

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Ozzie Newsome
86.3

Newsome leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories. Caught 662 passes for Cleveland and was a three-time Pro Bowl tight end.

1. Ozzie Newsome
86.3
2. John Mackey
86.3

Category breakdown

Season form · Touchdowns per season

Career timeline · Touchdowns per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Touchdowns per season
1. 🇺🇸 John Mackey5 seasons played · career day 1,825368 touchdowns
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Ozzie Newsome5 seasons played · career day 1,825307 touchdowns
-16.6% vs Mackey at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇺🇸 Newsome004598307651
🇺🇸 Mackey0050112368632

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricNewsomeRetiredMackeyRetired
Receptions662
Receiving yards7,9805,236
Consecutive games with a catch150
Pro Bowls35
Seasons played13
Super Bowl titles1
Career receptions331
Yards per catch16
Dominance w25%8286
Peak w20%9094
Longevity w20%9078
Honours w20%8086
Statistics w15%9288

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Newsome86.3
Mackey86.3
The people
Newsome
Mackey

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Newsome vs Mackey. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →