Who is better, Shriver or R. Doherty?
Reginald Doherty leads with a GOAT score of 87.9 against 87.4 for Pam Shriver — a gap of 0.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Reginald Doherty above Pam Shriver: 87.9 vs 87.4. Reginald Doherty leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics. Pam Shriver leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →R. Doherty wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shriver wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/pam-shriver-vs-reginald-doherty
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
R. Doherty leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Shriver | 0 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 35 | 81 |
| 🏴 R. Doherty | 0 | 0 | 40 | 91 | 314 | 710 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ShriverRetired | R. DohertyRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Slam doubles titles | 21 | — |
| Olympic golds | 1 | — |
| Calendar Grand Slam in doubles | 1 | — |
| WTA doubles titles | 112 | — |
| Singles Grand Slam finals | 1 | — |
| Wimbledon singles titles | — | 4 |
| Wimbledon doubles titles | — | 8 |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 3 |
| Davis Cup titles | — | 4 |
| Major finals | — | 8 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 88 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 92 | 90 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 90 |
Reginald Doherty leads with a GOAT score of 87.9 against 87.4 for Pam Shriver — a gap of 0.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shriver scores higher on honours, longevity. R. Doherty leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Shriver: 87.4, R. Doherty: 87.9.
Make your case for Shriver vs R. Doherty. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.