Who is better, Brown or Durán?
Panama Al Brown leads with a GOAT score of 90.3 against 90.3 for Roberto Durán — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Brown vs Durán
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Panama Al Brown and Roberto Durán level at 90.3. Panama Al Brown leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics. Roberto Durán leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
BrownWinner
90.3Brown wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Durán
90.3Durán wins: Longevity
Candidates
Locked to BoxingShareable URL · /compare/panama-al-brown-vs-roberto-duran
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇵🇦 Panama Al Brown
90.3
Brown leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Panama Al Brown
2. Roberto Durán
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇵🇦 Panama Al Brown5 years played · career day 1,825283 title wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇵🇦 Roberto Durán5 years played · career day 3,28732 title wins
-88.7% vs Brown at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇵🇦 Brown | 0 | 0 | 45 | 96 | 283 | 613 |
| 🇵🇦 Durán | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 32 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Brown90.3
Durán90.3
FAQ
Where does Durán beat Brown?
Durán scores higher on longevity. Brown leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
How is the Brown vs Durán score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Brown: 90.3, Durán: 90.3.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Brown vs Durán. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.