AthletesTeams
Gonzales vs Brough
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
GonzalesWinner
92.9Gonzales wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity
Brough
90.7Brough wins: Honours
Candidates
Locked to TennisShareable URL · /compare/pancho-gonzales-vs-louise-brough
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Pancho Gonzales
92.9
Gonzales leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Pancho Gonzales
2. Louise Brough
Category breakdown
Season form · Titles per season
Career timeline · Titles per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Titles per season1. 🇺🇸 Pancho Gonzales5 seasons played · career day 2,19134 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Louise Brough5 seasons played · career day 2,55620 titles
-41.2% vs Gonzales at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Gonzales | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 25 | 61 |
| 🇺🇸 Brough | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 33 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | GonzalesRetired | BroughRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Amateur Grand Slam titles | 2 | — |
| World professional titles | 8 | — |
| Pro tour tournament wins | 113 | — |
| US Pro titles | 8 | — |
| Career span in years | 27 | — |
| Grand Slam singles titles | — | 6 |
| Grand Slam doubles titles | — | 21 |
| Grand Slam mixed titles | — | 8 |
| Wimbledon singles titles | — | 4 |
| Wightman Cup ties won | — | 22 |
| Dominance w25% | 94 | 90 |
| Peak w20% | 96 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 92 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 90 | 92 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 92 |
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Gonzales92.9
Brough90.7
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Gonzales vs Brough. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.