GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

O'Hara Wood vs Martínez

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
MartínezWinner
82.0

Martínez wins: Longevity

O'Hara Wood
81.9

O'Hara Wood wins: Peak, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/pat-ohara-wood-vs-conchita-martinez

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇪🇸 Conchita Martínez
82.0

Martínez leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Wimbledon champion in 1994 and a Fed Cup winner five times.

1. Conchita Martínez
82.0
2. Pat O'Hara Wood
81.9

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇦🇺 Pat O'Hara Wood5 seasons played · career day 2,19118 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇪🇸 Conchita Martínez5 seasons played · career day 1,82613 titles
-27.8% vs O'Hara Wood at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇦🇺 O'Hara Wood00081327
🇪🇸 Martínez00131029

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricO'Hara WoodRetiredMartínezRetired
Grand Slam singles titles21
Grand Slam doubles titles5
Davis Cup titles1
Wimbledon doubles titles1
Career years15
WTA titles33
Fed Cup titles5
Olympic medals3
Career-high ranking2
Dominance w25%7676
Peak w20%9086
Longevity w20%8086
Honours w20%8080
Statistics w15%8684

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Martínez82.0
O'Hara Wood81.9
The people
O'Hara Wood
Martínez

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for O'Hara Wood vs Martínez. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →