Who is better, Rafter or Enqvist?
Thomas Enqvist leads with a GOAT score of 82.7 against 82.5 for Pat Rafter — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Thomas Enqvist above Pat Rafter: 82.7 vs 82.5. Thomas Enqvist leads on Longevity, Statistics. Pat Rafter leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Enqvist wins: Longevity, Statistics
Rafter wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/pat-rafter-vs-thomas-enqvist
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Enqvist leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇺 Rafter | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 12 |
| 🇸🇪 Enqvist | 0 | 0 | 0 | 120 | 192 | 238 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Thomas Enqvist leads with a GOAT score of 82.7 against 82.5 for Pat Rafter — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Rafter scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Enqvist leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Rafter: 82.5, Enqvist: 82.7.
Make your case for Rafter vs Enqvist. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.