Who is better, Guijarro or Ferdinand?
Patri Guijarro leads with a GOAT score of 79.6 against 79.6 for Rio Ferdinand — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Patri Guijarro and Rio Ferdinand level at 79.6. Patri Guijarro leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics. Rio Ferdinand leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Guijarro wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Ferdinand wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/patri-guijarro-vs-rio-ferdinand
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Guijarro leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇪🇸 Guijarro | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 36 | 71 |
| 🏴 Ferdinand | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 97 | 253 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | GuijarroActive | FerdinandRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Champions League titles | 3 | 1 |
| Liga F titles | 7 | — |
| Copa de la Reina titles | 5 | — |
| Spain caps | 40 | — |
| Barcelona appearances | 300 | — |
| Premier League titles | — | 6 |
| Appearances | — | 673 |
| England caps | — | 81 |
| League Cups | — | 3 |
| Clean sheets | — | 250 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 82 |
| Longevity w20% | 70 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 80 | 76 |
Patri Guijarro leads with a GOAT score of 79.6 against 79.6 for Rio Ferdinand — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Ferdinand scores higher on longevity. Guijarro leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Guijarro: 79.6, Ferdinand: 79.6.
Make your case for Guijarro vs Ferdinand. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.