GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Baum vs Feng

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
BaumWinner
75.4

Baum wins: Longevity, Honours

Feng
74.9

Feng wins: Peak, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Table Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/patrick-baum-tt-vs-feng-mengya

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇩🇪 Patrick Baum
75.4

Baum leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. European team champion with Germany and a Bundesliga stalwart.

1. Patrick Baum
75.4
2. Feng Mengya
74.9

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇩🇪 Patrick Baum5 seasons played · career day 1,825256 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇨🇳 Feng Mengya5 seasons played · career day 2,556238 titles
-7.0% vs Baum at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇩🇪 Baum004289256542
🇨🇳 Feng0000150264

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricBaumRetiredFengActive
European team titles2
World Championship team medals1
Olympic appearances1
Career world ranking best22
Bundesliga seasons15
World Tour titles2
Asian Championship medals1
Chinese Super League seasons10
Career highest world ranking12
National team call-ups15
Dominance w25%6868
Peak w20%7984
Longevity w20%8074
Honours w20%7670
Statistics w15%7682

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Baum75.4
Feng74.9
The people
Baum
Feng

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Baum vs Feng. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →