GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Depailler vs de Cesaris

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
DepaillerWinner
71.0

Depailler wins: Dominance, Honours

de Cesaris
70.6

de Cesaris wins: Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Formula 1

Shareable URL · /compare/patrick-depailler-vs-andrea-de-cesaris

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇫🇷 Patrick Depailler
71.0

Depailler leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. Won Monaco in 1978 after years of podium near-misses with Tyrrell.

1. Patrick Depailler
71.0
2. Andrea de Cesaris
70.6

Category breakdown

Season form · Race wins per season

Career timeline · Race wins per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Race wins per season
1. 🇮🇹 Andrea de Cesaris5 seasons played · career day 1,82624 race wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇫🇷 Patrick Depailler5 seasons played · career day 2,55619 race wins
-20.8% vs de Cesaris at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇫🇷 Depailler0000722
🇮🇹 de Cesaris00012131

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricDepaillerRetiredde CesarisRetired
Grand Prix wins2
Podiums195
Pole positions11
Grand Prix starts95208
Best championship finish4
Career points59
Seasons contested15
Dominance w25%6658
Peak w20%8282
Longevity w20%7088
Honours w20%6252
Statistics w15%7878

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Depailler71.0
de Cesaris70.6
The people
Depailler
de Cesaris

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Depailler vs de Cesaris. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →