Who is better, Ewing or Swoopes?
Sheryl Swoopes leads with a GOAT score of 83.5 against 83.4 for Patrick Ewing — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Sheryl Swoopes above Patrick Ewing: 83.5 vs 83.4. Sheryl Swoopes leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak. Patrick Ewing leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Swoopes wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Ewing wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/patrick-ewing-vs-sheryl-swoopes
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Swoopes leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Ewing | 0 | 0 | 20 | 41.5 | 113 | 212.3 |
| 🇺🇸 Swoopes | 0 | 0 | 7.1 | 22.7 | 80.2 | 144.5 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | EwingRetired | SwoopesRetired |
|---|---|---|
| All-Star selections | 11 | 6 |
| Career points | 24,815 | — |
| Career blocks | 2,894 | — |
| Olympic golds | 2 | 3 |
| Rookie of the Year | 1 | — |
| Finals appearances | 2 | — |
| WNBA titles | — | 4 |
| WNBA MVP awards | — | 3 |
| Defensive Player of the Year | — | 3 |
| Scoring titles | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 87 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 84 |
Sheryl Swoopes leads with a GOAT score of 83.5 against 83.4 for Patrick Ewing — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Ewing scores higher on statistics, longevity. Swoopes leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Ewing: 83.4, Swoopes: 83.5.
Make your case for Ewing vs Swoopes. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.