Who is better, Ewing or Cooper?
Patrick Ewing leads with a GOAT score of 83.4 against 83.4 for Charles Cooper — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Patrick Ewing and Charles Cooper level at 83.4. Patrick Ewing leads on Statistics, Longevity. Charles Cooper leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Ewing wins: Longevity, Statistics
Cooper wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/patrick-ewing-vs-tarzan-cooper
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Ewing leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Ewing | 0 | 0 | 20 | 41.5 | 113 | 212.3 |
| 🇺🇸 Cooper | 0 | 0 | 62 | 136 | 404 | 766 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | EwingRetired | CooperRetired |
|---|---|---|
| All-Star selections | 11 | — |
| Career points | 24,815 | — |
| Career blocks | 2,894 | — |
| Olympic golds | 2 | — |
| Rookie of the Year | 1 | — |
| Finals appearances | 2 | — |
| World Professional Tournament titles | — | 1 |
| Rens win streak in 1932-33 | — | 88 |
| Hall of Fame induction | — | 1,977 |
| Seasons with the Rens | — | 11 |
| Years at the top level | — | 17 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 87 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 80 |
Patrick Ewing leads with a GOAT score of 83.4 against 83.4 for Charles Cooper — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Cooper scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Ewing leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Ewing: 83.4, Cooper: 83.4.
Make your case for Ewing vs Cooper. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.