GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Rafter vs Kuerten

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
RafterWinner
77.4

Rafter wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics

Kuerten
76.1

Kuerten wins: Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/patrick-rafter-vs-gustavo-kuerten

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇦🇺 Patrick Rafter
77.4

Rafter leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. Back-to-back US Open titles in 1997 and 1998 and world No. 1.

1. Patrick Rafter
77.4
2. Gustavo Kuerten
76.1

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇦🇺 Patrick Rafter5 seasons played · career day 2,55618 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇧🇷 Gustavo Kuerten5 seasons played · career day 2,55614 titles
-22.2% vs Rafter at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇦🇺 Rafter0000630
🇧🇷 Kuerten0000417

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricRafterRetiredKuertenRetired
Grand Slam singles titles2
Weeks at No. 1143
ATP titles11
Davis Cup titles1
Wimbledon finals2
Grand Slam titles3
Career titles20
Tour Finals titles1
Masters 1000 titles5
Year-end No. 11
Dominance w25%7672
Peak w20%8886
Longevity w20%6672
Honours w20%7874
Statistics w15%8078

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Rafter77.4
Kuerten76.1
The people
Rafter
Kuerten

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Rafter vs Kuerten. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →