Who is better, P. Andersson or Güler?
Arda Güler leads with a GOAT score of 48.8 against 47.5 for Patrik Andersson — a gap of 1.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Arda Güler above Patrik Andersson: 48.8 vs 47.5. Arda Güler leads on Peak, Statistics, Dominance. Patrik Andersson leads on Honours, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Güler wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
P. Andersson wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/patrik-andersson-vs-ros-arda-guler
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Güler leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for Güler — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | P. AnderssonRetired · Bayern Munich | GülerActive · Real Madrid |
|---|---|---|
| Champions League titles | 1 | — |
| Bundesliga titles | 4 | — |
| Sweden caps | 96 | — |
| League titles | 6 | — |
| Major tournaments | 4 | — |
| Bragdguldet awards | 1 | — |
| League starts | — | 43 |
| League goals | — | 13 |
| League assists | — | 13 |
| UEFA Club Football Awards | — | 1 |
| Shirt number | — | 15 |
| Dominance w25% | 46 | 48.2 |
| Peak w20% | 48 | 70.4 |
| Longevity w20% | 52 | 34.6 |
| Honours w20% | 44 | 26 |
| Statistics w15% | 48 | 70.4 |
Arda Güler leads with a GOAT score of 48.8 against 47.5 for Patrik Andersson — a gap of 1.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
P. Andersson scores higher on honours, longevity. Güler leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. P. Andersson: 47.5, Güler: 48.8.
Make your case for P. Andersson vs Güler. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.