Who is better, Biedermann or Babashoff?
Paul Biedermann leads with a GOAT score of 86.5 against 86.5 for Shirley Babashoff — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Paul Biedermann and Shirley Babashoff level at 86.5. Paul Biedermann leads on Longevity. Shirley Babashoff leads on Honours, Dominance, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Biedermann wins: Longevity
Babashoff wins: Dominance, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/paul-biedermann-vs-shirley-babashoff
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Biedermann leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇩🇪 Biedermann | 0 | 0 | 45 | 101 | 244 | 673 |
| 🇺🇸 Babashoff | 0 | 0 | 50 | 116 | 296 | 484 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BiedermannRetired | BabashoffRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship titles | 2 | 3 |
| World records set | 2 | 11 |
| European titles | 5 | — |
| World Championship medals | 5 | — |
| German titles | 25 | — |
| Olympic medals | — | 8 |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 2 |
| US titles | — | 27 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 72 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 90 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 92 |
Paul Biedermann leads with a GOAT score of 86.5 against 86.5 for Shirley Babashoff — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Babashoff scores higher on dominance, honours, statistics. Biedermann leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Biedermann: 86.5, Babashoff: 86.5.
Make your case for Biedermann vs Babashoff. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.