Who is better, Endacott or Hanson?
Vic Hanson leads with a GOAT score of 75.7 against 75.0 for Paul Endacott — a gap of 0.7 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Vic Hanson above Paul Endacott: 75.7 vs 75.0. Vic Hanson leads on Peak, Honours, Statistics. Paul Endacott leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Hanson wins: Peak, Honours, Statistics
Endacott wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/paul-endacott-vs-vic-hanson
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Hanson leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Endacott | 0 | 0 | 64 | 142 | 400 | 598 |
| 🇺🇸 Hanson | 0 | 0 | 70 | 152 | 332 | 542 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | EndacottRetired | HansonRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Helms player of the year awards | 1 | — |
| Conference titles at Kansas | 2 | — |
| Hall of Fame induction | 1,972 | 1,960 |
| College seasons | 3 | 3 |
| AAU seasons | 4 | — |
| National championships | — | 1 |
| All-American selections | — | 3 |
| Professional seasons | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 66 | 64 |
| Honours w20% | 74 | 76 |
| Statistics w15% | 72 | 74 |
Vic Hanson leads with a GOAT score of 75.7 against 75.0 for Paul Endacott — a gap of 0.7 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Endacott scores higher on longevity. Hanson leads on peak, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Endacott: 75.0, Hanson: 75.7.
Make your case for Endacott vs Hanson. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.