Who is better, Endacott or Wembanyama?
Victor Wembanyama leads with a GOAT score of 75.1 against 75.0 for Paul Endacott — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Victor Wembanyama above Paul Endacott: 75.1 vs 75.0. Victor Wembanyama leads on Statistics, Peak, Dominance. Paul Endacott leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Wembanyama wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Endacott wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/paul-endacott-vs-victor-wembanyama
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Wembanyama leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Endacott | 0 | 0 | 64 | 142 | 400 | 598 |
| 🇫🇷 Wembanyama | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 52.4 | 100.7 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | EndacottRetired | WembanyamaActive · San Antonio Spurs |
|---|---|---|
| Helms player of the year awards | 1 | — |
| Conference titles at Kansas | 2 | — |
| Hall of Fame induction | 1,972 | — |
| College seasons | 3 | — |
| AAU seasons | 4 | — |
| Rookie of the Year awards | — | 1 |
| All-Defensive first teams | — | 1 |
| Blocks per game peak | — | 3.8 |
| Olympic medals | — | 1 |
| All-Star selections | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 66 | 52 |
| Honours w20% | 74 | 70 |
| Statistics w15% | 72 | 88 |
Victor Wembanyama leads with a GOAT score of 75.1 against 75.0 for Paul Endacott — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Endacott scores higher on honours, longevity. Wembanyama leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Endacott: 75.0, Wembanyama: 75.1.
Make your case for Endacott vs Wembanyama. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.