Who is better, Futre or Madjer?
Paulo Futre leads with a GOAT score of 79.0 against 78.9 for Rabah Madjer — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Paulo Futre above Rabah Madjer: 79.0 vs 78.9. Paulo Futre leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics. Rabah Madjer leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Futre wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Madjer wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/paulo-futre-vs-rabah-madjer
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Futre leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇵🇹 Futre | 0 | 0 | 0 | 62 | 296 | 644 |
| 🇩🇿 Madjer | 0 | 0 | 6 | 15 | 49 | 85 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | FutreRetired | MadjerRetired |
|---|---|---|
| European Cups | 1 | — |
| Ballon d'Or runner-up | 1 | — |
| Portuguese league titles | 2 | — |
| Copa del Rey titles | 2 | — |
| Portugal caps | 41 | — |
| European Cup titles | — | 1 |
| Intercontinental Cup titles | — | 1 |
| Africa Cup of Nations titles | — | 1 |
| African Footballer of the Year awards | — | 1 |
| Algeria caps | — | 87 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 68 | 74 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 78 | 76 |
Paulo Futre leads with a GOAT score of 79.0 against 78.9 for Rabah Madjer — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Madjer scores higher on honours, longevity. Futre leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Futre: 79.0, Madjer: 78.9.
Make your case for Futre vs Madjer. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.