Who is better, Beardsley or Carvalho?
Peter Beardsley leads with a GOAT score of 82.6 against 82.6 for Ricardo Carvalho — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Peter Beardsley and Ricardo Carvalho level at 82.6. Peter Beardsley leads on Dominance, Statistics, Peak. Ricardo Carvalho leads on Honours, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Beardsley wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Carvalho wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/peter-beardsley-vs-ricardo-carvalho
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Beardsley leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏴 Beardsley | 0 | 0 | 0 | 56 | 260 | 602 |
| 🇵🇹 Carvalho | 0 | 0 | 18 | 44 | 102 | 225 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BeardsleyRetired | CarvalhoRetired |
|---|---|---|
| League titles with Liverpool | 2 | — |
| FA Cups | 1 | — |
| England caps | 59 | — |
| Appearances for Newcastle United | 321 | — |
| Goals for Newcastle United | 117 | — |
| Champions League titles | — | 2 |
| Premier League titles | — | 3 |
| La Liga titles | — | 1 |
| Primeira Liga titles | — | 3 |
| Portugal caps | — | 89 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 80 | 76 |
Peter Beardsley leads with a GOAT score of 82.6 against 82.6 for Ricardo Carvalho — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Carvalho scores higher on honours, longevity. Beardsley leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Beardsley: 82.6, Carvalho: 82.6.
Make your case for Beardsley vs Carvalho. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.