Who is better, Beardsley or Zhirkov?
Yuri Zhirkov leads with a GOAT score of 82.7 against 82.6 for Peter Beardsley — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Yuri Zhirkov above Peter Beardsley: 82.7 vs 82.6. Yuri Zhirkov leads on Longevity, Honours. Peter Beardsley leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Zhirkov wins: Longevity, Honours
Beardsley wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/peter-beardsley-vs-yuri-zhirkov
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Zhirkov leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for Beardsley — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | BeardsleyRetired | ZhirkovRetired |
|---|---|---|
| League titles with Liverpool | 2 | — |
| FA Cups | 1 | — |
| England caps | 59 | — |
| Appearances for Newcastle United | 321 | — |
| Goals for Newcastle United | 117 | — |
| Russia caps | — | 105 |
| UEFA Cup titles | — | 1 |
| Premier League titles | — | 1 |
| Russian Premier League titles | — | 5 |
| Russian Cup titles | — | 6 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 85 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 80 | 78 |
Yuri Zhirkov leads with a GOAT score of 82.7 against 82.6 for Peter Beardsley — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Beardsley scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Zhirkov leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Beardsley: 82.6, Zhirkov: 82.7.
Make your case for Beardsley vs Zhirkov. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.