Who is better, Revson or Gasly?
Peter Revson leads with a GOAT score of 71.8 against 71.8 for Pierre Gasly — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Revson vs Gasly
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Peter Revson and Pierre Gasly level at 71.8. Peter Revson leads on Peak. Pierre Gasly leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
RevsonWinner
71.8Revson wins: Peak
Gasly
71.8Gasly wins: Longevity
Candidates
Locked to Formula 1Shareable URL · /compare/peter-revson-vs-pierre-gasly
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Peter Revson
71.8
Revson leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Peter Revson
2. Pierre Gasly
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇺🇸 Peter Revson4 seasons played · career day 4,0178 race wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇫🇷 Pierre Gasly5 seasons played · career day 1,8256 race wins
-25.0% vs Revson at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Revson | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| 🇫🇷 Gasly | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 9 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Revson71.8
Gasly71.8
FAQ
Where does Gasly beat Revson?
Gasly scores higher on longevity. Revson leads on peak.
How is the Revson vs Gasly score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Revson: 71.8, Gasly: 71.8.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Revson vs Gasly. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.